Buying Facilitation® Monday

Cranky Tuesday

Reviews Thursday

Sales Friday

Home » Sales, Technology & Buying Facilitation®

Great Leads, No Business: the problem with marketing automation

Submitted by Sharon Drew Morgen on Friday, 14 January 2011

Marketing automation people are techies who just love the idea of extracting data with wizzy technology. But they are not sales people. As a result, there are some ‘features and functions‘  missing. Like, how to close sales.

The glaring issue is the concentration on the top of the funnel vs. the bottom of the funnel. The sales industry has been running around screaming “But how do I close these leads?” And the marketing automation industry does not seem to be listening. They just keep giving us more and more technology to capture and push better and better data – and then we spend bazillions of dollars to implement the technology, go through internal turmoil as we re-organize teams to use the technology  and find ways to close sales, and then only close 1-6% of the names we elicit!

We are wasting over 90% of the leads we capture from technology!!

WHAT IS MARKETING AUTOMATION FOR

Don’t get me wrong. Marketing automation is great – fabulous, brilliant – at the top of the funnel. We get a bunch of email addresses and some names.

But these are Names. That’s it. Names. They may or may not be leads. They may or may not be prospects. Names.

In the old days, we used to buy lists, or make cold calls. And we closed 7% of our sales –  abysmal, but certainly more than we’re closing with marketing automation (companies claim to be closing 20%, but they track from an appointment or connect… which assumes the 90%+ folks who don’t respond never needed your solution).

Where is the technology to help us follow and influence the behind-the-scenes, private, idiosyncratic decisions and considerations buyers must address before they can buy?

I failed to find tech partners to add decision facilitation technology to marketing automation.  Every company I called –  Marketo, EloquaManticore, Leadformix, Pardot - agree they have no way to manage the names they collect, other than do lead scoring, lead nurturing, or handing them over to a telemarketing group.

One industry leader - Carlos Hidalgo – won’t even entertain the notion that there is something trackable and supportable at the internal behind-the-scenes, pre-sale portion of the buying journey. In an email to me he wrote: ”I do not see buyer following an approach where they get all of the internal items checked-off before engaging a vendor or a sales process.” He knows neither the full set of systems issues prospects must address before considering a new solution (which are codifiable and can be influenced to bring in prospects who didn’t think they were ready), nor the full set of private internal issues they must manage after a potential vendor is engaged (where we lose our sales) and before they actually buy.

POSSIBILITIES NOT BEING OFFERED

It’s possible to actually support and influence every activity that buyers must go through off-line as they work through the necessary internal buy-in, relationships, and change management issues necessary for them to make a purchase.

In my latest book – Dirty Little Secrets: why buyers can’t buy and sellers can’t sell and what you can do about it – I lay out a systems thinking list of non-need related  ’to-dos’ that buyers must address – like putting together a Buying Decision Team, or addressing potential change management issues, or getting agreement, needs, and ideas from everyone who will touch the solution.

  • Imagine if your technology could enter the buying decision earlier.
  • Imagine if while you were collecting names, you were turning them into leads.
  • Imagine if you began offering your prospects service before you contacted them.
  • Imagine if when you made contact, they already had their full Buying Decision Team on board and a whole team were ready to meet you.
  • Imagine if you closed 30% of YOUR ENTIRE POPULATION OF LEADS rather than just the 1% that end up falling out the bottom.

Marketing automation is capable of far more. Its vision - mirroring the short-sighted, solution-focused sales model – is just too limited. And you and  your prospects are suffering the consequences.

By thinking beyond the sales model into the change management model that occurs prior to buyers being able to buy, your digital selling vendors can develop a way to enter and manage the behind-the-scenes buying journey earlier so the leads you get are already qualifed. Call them and yell. Or call me and we’ll discuss it.

SD

Read some of my articles in my ‘digital selling‘ group. See what’s possible. I bet between us we can enhance the industry to ensure that you close a lot more sales.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • http://twitter.com/friendlybroker Dan Tolman

    Excellent article. I’ve always dreamed of the holy grail of sales where I would know exactly when the buyer was prepared to buy and that I was at the top of their mind. Although this exact scenario has happened to me through our automated marketing; it certainly doesn’t happen often enough! I like your thinking and will continue to browse your blog. Dan

  • http://sharondrewmorgen.com/2011/04/deliver-the-right-content-at-the-right-stage-of-the-buy-path/ Deliver the Right Content at the Right Stage of the Buy-Path | Sharon Drew Morgen

    [...] are a few questions for those of you using marketing automation and lead [...]

  • http://sharondrewmorgen.com/2011/05/how-do-you-design-a-contact-sheet-and-are-you-really-capturing-the-right-data/ Contact sheets: are they gathering the right data? | Sharon Drew Morgen

    [...] a result of the debatable usefulness of the data collected, sellers have no idea who they are following, nurturing, or trying to make an appointment with. Or [...]

  • http://sharondrewmorgen.com/2011/04/anguish-and-trust/ Trying to make a difference in a field that enjoys failure | Sharon Drew Morgen

    [...] I realized how the marketing automation field was directing their marketing promises, I called all of the marketing automation firms and [...]

  • http://sharondrewmorgen.com/2011/05/tying-performance-to-revenue/ Marketing automation follows a small segment of the buying decision path | Sharon Drew Morgen

    [...] the larger marketing automation firms are trying to promote is dubbed ‘revenue performance management.’ What does this [...]

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IAYMLRS4SBXKF7PKLFRLO4WNHM Matt Williams

    Pretty nice article. Marketing automation helps organizations get rid of cumbersome manual tasks related to planning and implementation of marketing campaigns. This helps in better performance and enhances productivity. Marketing Automation Software | Sales Force Automation

  • http://sharondrewmorgen.com sharondrew

    ======

  • http://sharondrewmorgen.com/2011/03/first-contact-what-to-do-why-and-how-to-get-the-results-you-want/ First Contact: what to do, why, and how to get better results | Sharon Drew Morgen

    [...] thereby delaying a purchase. When you Qualify a lead via marketing automation, and use some sort of subjective lead scoring, you are omitting perfectly good leads that fall out of the marketing automation or lead [...]

  • http://sharondrewmorgen.com/2011/11/an-intelligent-contact-sheet/ An Intelligent Contact Sheet | Sharon Drew Morgen

    [...] There should be a higher close rate:  of 10,000 names, approximately 400 are scored as viable, and of these, 2 close. How many of the 10,000 might be buyers? How many of the 400 might be buyers if approached or [...]

  • http://leadingonlinemarketing.net/business/an-intelligent-contact-sheet.html An Intelligent Contact Sheet | Business News – Tech News – Entertainment – Mobile – Social Media

    [...] There should be a higher close rate:  of 10,000 names, approximately 400 are scored as viable, and of these, 2 close. How many of the 10,000 might be buyers? How many of the 400 might be buyers if approached or [...]